superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 hours agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 hours agomessage-square133fedilink
minus-squarenailingjello@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up109·14 hours agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·8 hours agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·32 minutes agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 hours agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)