“If somebody breaks into my house, they’re getting shot,” she said, laughing. “I probably should not have said that. My staff will deal with that later.”

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    And then you get shot when it turns out to be the police raiding your home unannounced because they got the address wrong again.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 hour ago

    America is so fucked. Both parties dont give af about the gun problem. Just one side cares a bit less than the other

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    These idiots filmed themselves trying to overthrow the government. They’ll taking this as a dare/challenge

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I like this for some reason. Maybe even more if she slipped and said “fuckin’ shot” maybe because it’s Oprah.

    Weird that the whole “I probably shouldn’t say that” is a very Trump like thing to say, but those types of comments have a lot of power with people so more power to her.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      It was an authentic moment and people love that. I watched it live and was like dayum.

      I’ve done a shit ton of research and writing on the topic of firearm regulation. I grew up with them as well. I am absolutely for very strict firearm regulation… However: I think it’s time democrats pivot on this to root causes: education, Healthcare, and societal stressors. The electorate just isn’t there yet, and it will probably take another 2 decades at least before the boomers die off and any movement can be made.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I mean, anyone who hasn’t realized that she has 24/7 secret service protection and they’re going to fucking shoot anyone whose an intruder to any of their protectees homes…

    are kinda dumb.

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      kinda dumb.

      You really think the cult isn’t that dumb? Any bets that one of them will try it? Of course MAGA would claim it was her fault in any circumstance.

    • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I mean, this is a pretty logical and understandable consequence of the right’s call for political violence. I was pretty surprised the Pelosi intruder was able to do so much, tbh.

      Edit: But, yes, people are dumb and disingenuous and will say that they should be able to kill an intruder on their property without question and then turn around and say that Harris’ detail should not be allowed to do so.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        And the gun control single issue voters- at least a few.

        I don’t think most people realize just how un-hesitant a secret service on protection detail will be to shoot an unknown intruder.

        Like. That’s not a Harris thing. That’s just their job. Which is why the guy that saw a rifle more or less just started blasting. (Maybe not “just”… I assume they assessed range and stuff. A pistol at 200 yards is almost useless even if you do hit what you’re aiming at.)

  • qjkxbmwvz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Reminds me of that West Wing episode where he “accidentally” makes an offensive gun analogy comment; Harris doesn’t really alienate any supporters here, and she appeals to the undecided gun crowd voters. As a bonus, she’s “telling it like it is” for folks who are self-described as being “fed up with PC culture.”

    • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Your bonus point is depressingly significant. The number of people I’ve heard say something like, “I don’t like x, y, z about Trump, but I like that he speaks his mind and tells it like it is in his opinion” drives me crazy. When did it become admirable to be an unfiltered boor?

    • Vanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Agreed. I thought it was one of the best things out of her mouth at the event (which was surprisingly well done, worth a watch). I think people want to see more honest, unprepared remarks from her (she’s been really staying on message). But I doubt there will be many more events like this with hosts like Oprah, who is quite skilled at producing these moments.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What are we going to do with all those Louisville Sluggers, sitting in the hallway closet?

  • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    She forgot the “a” in her statement. Any intruder in her house is gonna get a COVID vaccination.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Kamala Harris is Vice President of the United States of America and the POTUS is mentally compromised. If she shoots anyone while under threat, which a break in would suggest, she’ll just get a nod and probably even keep her handgun.

    If/when she is POTUS she’ll have immunity, per SCOTUS.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You don’t need to be POTUS to be found innocent in most states. Many have stand your ground rules, and many more at least have self defense rules.

      Granted in her case, she has secret service so it’s a moot point.

    • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Shooting people isn’t a constitutionally enumerated right of the office of the president

      She’d have to order one of her executive employees to do it

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        According to SCOTUS, anything the President does could be immune to prosecution, including shooting someone, intruder or otherwise.

        • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Not anything, it’s only shit the SCOTUS deems as “an official act”, so it can be open to interpretation based off the politics of the Supreme Court justices.

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t think POTUS or VPOTUS, even pre SCOTUS insane decision on presidential immunity, would be prosecuted for standing ground or engaging would be castle law, even in a state without either. I don’t think any of those offices would be held to duty to retreat either, and rightly so.