A set of licenses, based on the GPL, with additional clauses to prevent the use of the software for nefarious purposes.
EDIT: After some issues raised, I am rebasing the license on the Apache License 2.0 and taking more care in keeping it open.
EDIT 2: I’ve rebased it. I plan to submit it to OSI as soon as my law student friend has a look at it.
I thought it was still open; just not free/libre?
Exactly. It is still open source, but not libre.
It could be source available, but not open source.
The open source initiative defines what open source means and states it can’t discriminate against any person group or field of endeavor which I read as if it restricts who uses it, it isn’t open source
https://opensource.org/osd/
deleted by creator
The open source initiative defines what open source means and states it can’t discriminate against any person group or field of endeavor which I read as if it restricts who uses it, it isn’t open source
https://opensource.org/osd/
I’m rebasing the license on the Apache License 2.0.
Doesn’t the ASL allow re-licensing derivative works?
Also… do you really think that if I’m into committing war crimes I care about a software license?