Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoSquare!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down135cross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square134fedilinkcross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·1 day agoAlso pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down2·24 hours agoThis one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down11·23 hours agoNo, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.” Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down3·23 hours agoOK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down7·edit-21 hour agoWell then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 hour agoThe angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoMy apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·23 hours agoWhy? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down7·22 hours agoWithout a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-squareStopJoiningWars@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·21 hours agoI hope for you that you’re high.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·19 hours agoThe cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-217 hours agoFun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
Also pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.”
Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
The angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
My apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
I hope for you that you’re high.
The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
Ceci n’est pas une cube.