“Asked for an update on the progress of this regulatory approval, an FAA spokesman said Wednesday morning that additional information may be provided soon.”

  • weew@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    betting time! Will it be able to:

    1. pass the launch tower?
    2. get through MaxQ? <– the high score so far
    3. Properly separate stages? (hot staging this time!)
    4. get to orbital velocity?
    5. complete its partial orbit?
    6. survive re-entry forces?
    7. hit the specified “landing” zone? 7b. Will the booster hit its landing zone?

    wildcard: will the self destruct work properly this time?

    • clothes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’ll reach separation (3), but too many engines will have shutdown to reach orbital velocity(4). Self destruct will be beautiful and immediate this time.

  • pigeonberry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Scott Manley had comments starting with Sep 7, 2023 · 12:42 AM UTC:

    Elon: we’re ready, just waiting on the license from the FAA

    FAA: funny you should say that, we’re just waiting on you guys to fix the problems you had.

    Sure it’s easy to think of the FAA as being a bunch of bureaucrats who should loosen up and cut SpaceX some slack, but after the rock tornado and wimpy FTS SpaceX has used up any slack it might have had.

    Furthermore, the FAA is being sued alleging that it cut SpaceX too much slack on the environmental review surrounding Starbase. Any action they take could end up in court and they need to be sure it’s defensible before a jury https://www.space.com/spacex-faa-seek-dismiss-starship-lawsuit

    Though someone else replied,

    Setting aside that this answer is the same the FAA would give regardless of whether it was the day after IFT-1 or the day before they issued a license.

    and Scott replied, “Correct”.

  • pigeonberry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The story was edited.

    (Note: at 6 pm ET on Wednesday, the FAA issued the following statement).

    “The SpaceX Starship mishap investigation remains open,” the agency stated. “The FAA will not authorize another Starship launch until SpaceX implements the corrective actions identified during the mishap investigation and demonstrates compliance with all the regulatory requirements of the license modification process.”

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      that is a pretty deliberately broad statement. the obvious mitigations are all in place, like the water deluge system and the new self destruct. There may be plenty of other, smaller issues though.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    FAA Federal Aviation Administration
    FTS Flight Termination System
    MaxQ Maximum aerodynamic pressure

    3 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 18 acronyms.

    [Thread #6 for this sub, first seen 7th Sep 2023, 03:30] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]