I get that it started for free with less intrusive ads, but YouTube has had a huge impact on the way we all share and consume information. Understanding how much money it takes to run a service with the technology needed to provide high definition videos on a site that is up 99.9999999% of the time, I have no issue paying for a service that has changed my life in many positive ways. Now I do hate price gouging like everyone else, but it’s inescapable from gas & groceries to all streaming platforms.

  • Clent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have a family plan but it’s not for any reason other than my children use it and I can afford to pay to reduce their ad exposure. We live in a swing state so they were previously bombarded with political advertising.

    The way I see it, I swapped the Netflix account for a YouTube account because that’s what the kids favor now. If they move on, I will drop it immediately. If the price goes up then I am very likely to drop it. It’s already overpriced for what it is.

  • azenyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The problem is that the paid premium is NOT better than free with extensions. Piracy is a service problem, and the paid service is NOT better than the “pirated” one. Even if premium was completely free, if it didn’t allow extensions I would still use the ad version with extensions.

    Revanced android apps also exist, and I won’t use them with premium accounts (no point) and they are the only way of having sponsorblock, return youtube dislike, manual HDR and many other small but very useful features.

    I would gladly pay for the content if and when the youtube official apps and website had features similar to those extensions.

  • TBi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I didn’t really mind until the recent pay rise. It was ok value (for me) before. Now it’s getting expensive. Not sure if I’ll cancel or not yet.

    • Avg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I cancelled Disney+ after the last increase, if YouTube premium does the same, I’ll have to reconsider, I can’t justify paying over $20 to only get rid of ads.

  • Blubber28@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There was a time where I would have been happy to pay for it too, back when the ads were less intrusive. However, the number of ads increased drastically when they started pushing premium, and it’s only gotten worse - not to mention the fact that, even though they make more money, the content creators (employees) are paid less per view. I don’t mind paying for a product or service. I do mind paying to make an engineered inconvenience from a mega corporation that has a de facto monopoly go away.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I was under the impression premium views result in more revenue for the creators you watch compared to views with ads.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They do but it’s not that much more significant than overall ad revenue. Having a Patreon or a merch store will probably outperform 10 fold anything that YouTube pays from both ads and premium views combined.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I miss Metacafe and Big-Boys/Break.com. You know, from the days when YouTube actually had competition.

  • Tinks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I agree with this, though part of it is that I am still grandfathered into the $7.99/mo original Google Music launch promo price. It is worth it to me not to see ads to continue paying for it. The current monthly premium at $14/mo for new users is insanity.

  • tteok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Just use Brave browser and you will not see any ads, anywhere, on any website… for free.

  • NRay7882@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I also don’t mind using ReVanced and getting the same features as YouTube Premium for free.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It made economic sense for us to get the YouTube Premium family plan. When we dropped several streaming services and also Spotify, it was a bit more expensive than Spotify’s family plan, but YouTube without the ads was worth it, especially considering they have a huge library of movies that they are offering in high quality for streaming.

    Honestly, I’m more satisfied than when I was paying for Spotify Family and Disney+ and Paramount+. And if I must see the eight billionth Marvel show of the year, which I generally don’t, there’s always the high seas.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I already paid for a lifetime of free Google services with all the data they stole from me before I had any sense that something so massive and invasive could even exist.

    Thanks to ReVanced and Freetube and some others, Google can effortlessly pay out their equitable share.

  • Kyouki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Would rather pay the creators directly instead of it going 80% to anyone in ceo position and maybe 5% to the creator.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      At least with ads, 60% goes to the creator and 40% to YouTube. I had a video go viral because it was newsworthy, and a CDN (Storyful) offered to help with licensing and marketing, and their price was 40% of my 60%. I wasn’t really expecting the video to go viral, so decided “why not.”

      I only got 36% of the money from the YouTube views, but Storyful delivered and got it on the news and a few documentaries and I ended up making thousands of dollars for a few minutes of video. 10/10 would do again, but then YouTube changed the rules and now you need like 1,000 subscribers for your video to even qualify for monetization :(

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If you are paying for premium, you are paying twice.

    Once with money, a second time with your data.

    I’d gladly pay for an option where they stopped tracking me.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You can literally change that in your settings.

      But then YouTube doesn’t know what you have watched or anything it’s pretty bad for user experience

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        For an eclectic viewer like me I am the complete opposite of you; being tracked and remembered by YouTube would be miserable. I arrive at a fresh home page that shows only a search bar every time I go there. (There are no video thumbnails) I have to stop and think about what I want to watch. I click on a video after searching, reload the page to skip the ad, unmute and away I go. Any creator I want to remember I’ll take a screen shot and then copy and paste their channel name to notes.

  • f314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I only wish they’d kept the “premium light” option (which I paid for until they canceled it). I don’t need another music service or locked screen playback, so I wish I could still pay a bit less for not using those.

  • Bromine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I don’t mind ads.

    But I do mind having targeted ads. To be fair, most of what Google presumes about me is wrong, but from the ad patterns it’s pretty obvious what’s going on. Our data shouldn’t be hoarded and we shouldn’t be herded like cattle from which they can extract money through ad placement.

    I’m fine with subscription services, and ads, but the steps they’re taking to maximize their revenue is gross and I don’t just mean youtube. This is just the stuff we know about for sure.

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I enjoy making Google hurt by blocking the ad revenue.

    I would be ecstatic if they failed as a company.

    Google is evil, supporting them financially is unethical.