• Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    198
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    The normal person thinks that because the last 20 people survived, the next patient is very likely to die.

    The mathematician considers that the probability of success for each surgery is independent, so in the mathematician’s eyes the next patient has a 50% chance of survival.

    The scientist thinks that the statistic is probably gathered across a large number of different hospitals. They see that this particular surgeon has an unusually high success rate, so they conclude that their own surgery has a >50% chance of success.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The scientist is making a possibly incorrect assumption based on incomplete data. All we know is that the last 20 were successful.

      It’s the same as seeing someone flip tails 20 times in a row. Do you think it’s just a coincidence and the chance of heads or tails is still 50/50 or do think there’s something special about the person that makes them flip tails more often?

      • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Or do think there’s something special about the person that makes them flip tails more often?

        Yes, that’s the conclusion that the scientist has come to. The chance of getting 20 in a row is so extraordinarily unlikely that it’s reasonable to conclude that the chance is not 50/50 for that particular surgeon.