• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ah yes, the power to… defend against attacks from other nations. Such evil.

    For anyone who isn’t aware, there are no provisions in the NATO charter for cooperative offensive actions. None. NATO is not a military alliance, it is a defensive pact only.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah but arent you gonna attack me when I defensively invade some sovereign country?!!

      Checkmate

      \s

    • interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I’m mostly pro NATO but that is litteraly the worst single argument possible anyone ever made. Here’s a one word answer that totally shred its credibility: Lybia.

      It’s only for defense until we decide to invade a country… but anyway, the real strength of NATO as a weapon is political influence. It allows the US to impose their security objectives to all the other members, and currently their main competitor is China and that was transcribed into NATO’s official strategy in 2022 with the stated objective to expend into the Indian and Pacific ocean specifically to counter them.

      Can’t really expect them to like it.

      • wieson@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        Lybia is not a NATO thing. UK, France and USA bombed some ships and ports in Libya, but I still remember the headlines and news that Germany didn’t want anything to do with that.

        So it was a coordinated action between some members of NATO on their own.