A senior Ukrainian official says this enabled Russian attacks and accuses him of “committing evil”.

  • jayrhacker@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We know that DoD is paying for Starlink service in Ukraine, but there are no public details of the contract. Not sure how paying for a service is a subsidy.

    “Opposing Autocracy” is an interesting choice of words, since everyone who’s up in arms about this is implying that the government should force a private company to participate in any war on whatever terms they dictate. Freedom isn’t easy, sometimes people and companies do stuff you don’t like, but I we want a working democracy you have to give them that liberty or else loose your own eventually.

    • JWBananas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We know that DoD is paying for Starlink service in Ukraine

      Are they?

      All of it?

      From CNN Exclusive: ‘How am I in this war?’: New Musk biography offers fresh details about the billionaire’s Ukraine dilemma:

      SpaceX had spent tens of millions of its own money sending the satellite equipment to Ukraine, according to Musk. And the company told the Pentagon that they wouldn’t continue to foot the bill for the satellite gear, as CNN first reported last October.

      After CNN’s reporting, Musk reversed course, tweeting “the hell with it … we’ll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free.”

      Gwynne Shotwell, Musk’s president at SpaceX, was livid at Musk’s reversal, according to Isaacso

      “The Pentagon had a $145 million check ready to hand to me, literally,” Isaacson quotes Shotwell as saying. “Then Elon succumbed to the bullshit on Twitter and to the haters at the Pentagon who leaked the story.”

      Why would he turn down money? He’s not exactly known for being on the side of morality.

      Is it not possible that he intentionally turned down the Pentagon check so that he could continue to provide the service on his own terms, versus those of the Pentagon? Including the ability to revoke/block it when/where he saw fit?