Flying Squid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoMarjorie Taylor Greene Says States Should 'Consider Seceding From the Union'www.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square250fedilinkarrow-up1539arrow-down143
arrow-up1496arrow-down1external-linkMarjorie Taylor Greene Says States Should 'Consider Seceding From the Union'www.rollingstone.comFlying Squid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square250fedilink
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·1 year agoI don’t care about thought exercises Unless it’s yours 🤷
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·1 year agoAin’t that the whole point of common law? There’s no legal framework -> go to court -> set the precedent -> there’s your framework
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·1 year agoIn Texas v. White’s ruling: There was no place for reconsideration, or revocation, except through revolution, or through consent of the States. Scalia’s opinion on the subject was shared as an answer to a letter so it has no legal precedence.
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoSorry if I gave an example of a state that already has agreed borders and that actually compares to rich nations like I was asked 🤷
deleted by creator
I don’t care about thought exercises
Unless it’s yours 🤷
deleted by creator
Ain’t that the whole point of common law? There’s no legal framework -> go to court -> set the precedent -> there’s your framework
deleted by creator
In Texas v. White’s ruling:
There was no place for reconsideration, or revocation, except through revolution, or through consent of the States.
Scalia’s opinion on the subject was shared as an answer to a letter so it has no legal precedence.
deleted by creator
Sorry if I gave an example of a state that already has agreed borders and that actually compares to rich nations like I was asked 🤷
deleted by creator