• wise_pancake@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s surprisingly low.

    Definitely would make me not pay knowing that stat.

  • kryptonidas@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    I always heard that the criminals would restore the data, else they kill their own business plan. So this is surprising to me.

  • zzx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    I work in this field for a living. This number is bullshit, most organizations get their data back after paying…

    Think about it. What is in the criminal’s best interest

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This would benefit them if they have to cover data loss. They increase insurance fees.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hmm, I’ve always heard the opposite, and that they even go so far as providing tech support to help restore the data after paying. If word got out that they didn’t restore the data after paying, no one would pay.

  • TarantulaFudge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah I’m surprised because my understanding was a lot of businesses were paying so it’s hard to wrap my head around why someone would want to do that now.