• Fixbeat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yep, my experience is that companies fiddle with the scores and payouts to avoid rewarding people. It’s why wages haven’t gone up much. On top of that, the review process is as annoying and pointless as possible.

      • DrMango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t even tell you how many time my annual reviews have been some form of “well you exceeded expectations and are one of the top performers on our team, that’s why we are giving you a middle rating. Enjoy your COLA raise which is well below the rate of inflation.”

      • 50gp@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        wonder how much money they lose long term by not rewarding good work and building lifetime employees

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure, but I quit my last job over this, which caused them a lot of hardship. I was still getting texts a year later asking how things worked. My ex-coworkers on LinkedIn have messaged me more than once saying nothing gets done or done right since I left.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reviews are directly tied to the bonuses, so they have a point and Microsoft has financial motivation to doctor them. It’s pretty frustrating that institutions with more money than they’ll ever need, still engage in unethical practices to hoard more money. Like, you’ve made it guys, just be cool. Is it that hard to be cool?

  • EchoCranium@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Performance management systems have always been rigged. Certainly at the last company that both my wife and I worked for. She had to manage a small staff, and come review time, she rated one deserving employee with a 4 out of 5 overall. HR called her in and said, “You can’t give anyone a four, we don’t do that here.” They changed the scores and the employee got a 3 like everyone else. Complete bullshit.

  • This is absolutely a thing they do at the tech company I work at too. There’s hard limits on how many people can be rated anything 4 stars and up. Managers have to go to “calibration meetings” where they argue, in front of HR, with other managers about why their employee deserves one of the spots in the 4 (or more) stars club.