AbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 年前Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isexternal-linkmessage-square265linkfedilinkarrow-up1862arrow-down140file-textcross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
arrow-up1822arrow-down1external-linkApple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isAbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 年前message-square265linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 年前Sure. We weren’t discussing if AI creates value or not. If you ask a different question then you get a different answer.
minus-squareMangoCats@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·1 年前Well - if you want to devolve into argument, you can argue all day long about “what is reasoning?”
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·edit-21 年前You were starting a new argument. Let’s stay on topic. The paper implies “Reasoning” is application of logic. It shows that LRMs are great at copying logic but can’t follow simple instructions that haven’t been seen before.
Sure. We weren’t discussing if AI creates value or not. If you ask a different question then you get a different answer.
Well - if you want to devolve into argument, you can argue all day long about “what is reasoning?”
You were starting a new argument. Let’s stay on topic.
The paper implies “Reasoning” is application of logic. It shows that LRMs are great at copying logic but can’t follow simple instructions that haven’t been seen before.