AbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoApple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isexternal-linkmessage-square264linkfedilinkarrow-up1862arrow-down140file-textcross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
arrow-up1822arrow-down1external-linkApple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isAbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square264linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoSure. We weren’t discussing if AI creates value or not. If you ask a different question then you get a different answer.
minus-squareMangoCats@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·1 year agoWell - if you want to devolve into argument, you can argue all day long about “what is reasoning?”
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoYou were starting a new argument. Let’s stay on topic. The paper implies “Reasoning” is application of logic. It shows that LRMs are great at copying logic but can’t follow simple instructions that haven’t been seen before.
Sure. We weren’t discussing if AI creates value or not. If you ask a different question then you get a different answer.
Well - if you want to devolve into argument, you can argue all day long about “what is reasoning?”
You were starting a new argument. Let’s stay on topic.
The paper implies “Reasoning” is application of logic. It shows that LRMs are great at copying logic but can’t follow simple instructions that haven’t been seen before.