Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 年前It's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.message-squaremessage-square153linkfedilinkarrow-up1620arrow-down150
arrow-up1570arrow-down1message-squareIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square153linkfedilink
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·1 年前And dems demonizing gun ownership. Seems it worked out great for the right (er) wing.
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前No, it really didn’t benefit them in any meaningful way. Widespread gun ownership has gotten an enormous number of innocent people killed though.
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Well in the states yes, since it is seen as some sort of right and not a privilege that requires basic safety training. The rest of the planet seems to be more sensible.
And dems demonizing gun ownership. Seems it worked out great for the right (er) wing.
No, it really didn’t benefit them in any meaningful way.
Widespread gun ownership has gotten an enormous number of innocent people killed though.
Well in the states yes, since it is seen as some sort of right and not a privilege that requires basic safety training. The rest of the planet seems to be more sensible.