I get your perspective, and would not even deny that when you added that, you got better response
You act like it wouldnt be helpful at all
what part of above made you blive i suggested always?
I do not hate ai (at least not as much as an average fediverse person). As a researcher, i know what ml can do. llms are fine for language processing, and i even run local models (less than 10B). I do not like how a lot of things are going on (not going about them here), but I do not hate ai.
I even suggested a way that can be implemented to tool call whenever it reads verifiable sources, but never said never. I would recommend you to read my original comment.
It literally does help, I do this.
Anyway they said “often” not “guaranteed”.
You act like it wouldnt be helpful at all to have sources provided. Seems like you just hate ai and want everyone else to hate it too.
what part of above made you blive i suggested always?
I do not hate ai (at least not as much as an average fediverse person). As a researcher, i know what ml can do. llms are fine for language processing, and i even run local models (less than 10B). I do not like how a lot of things are going on (not going about them here), but I do not hate ai.
I even suggested a way that can be implemented to tool call whenever it reads verifiable sources, but never said never. I would recommend you to read my original comment.
oh, no it was the first sentence that stated “It does not.”
sorry for the misunderstanding.