The talk about “enshittification” made me think of the very email we use for the instances we signed up and instantly, it paints a grim picture. One of my account used gmail to sign up. Some proton mail. It reminds me that these too are companies beholden to their shareholders.

Is there a fediverse answer to email? Like what mastodon is to twitter and lemmy is for reddit?

If not, maybe the fediverse can think about allowing email-less sign-ups?

As an addendum, what about the popular tools we use in our daily lives? The calendar, note tools, etc all are products of companies driven to maximize profits.

There’s a talk in the technology sub about how GitHub was acquired by microsoft and I’m willing to bet that it’s not the only popular tool that was or will be endangered of disappearing or turning worse in the name of profit.

Is there a community movement that can somehow mitigate this? Or is there really no choice for us? Is there a complete list of FOSS somewhere that are at par or at least only mildly worse than the popular mainstream ones?

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    187
    ·
    1 year ago

    Email is a federated system. You can host your own email server. Email was the fediverse before the fediverse was cool.

    • yogsototh@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But there are many EEE attempts by big players.

      Microsoft Exchange is not entirely compatible with normal protocols in subtle ways to provide outlook-only features which makes it very difficult for me to use my preferred email client for my work emails. So I am naturally forced to use outllook while I hate it.

      Gmail can easily mark any small and private email domain as spam making. And in fact there are many stories like these, where people stopped self hosting their email server to use a bigger player (and often pay for it) so their emails are seen. If gmail was smaller, they wouldn’t have so much power as forcing most people to not host email.

      So the conclusion for me is not corporate vs free/FOSS. But more about preventing having too much power in a single instance which is why it is important not to let threads federate and take >90% of the content, participants, etc…

      • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Outlook simply connects to exchange. You can buy and run your own exchange email server. People have done it for years.

        Gmail handles the spam filtering because the protocol hasn’t changed since the 70s. It is the same protocol since then. It basically evolved to have spam lists and deliverability ratings based on necessity. Deliverability is impacted by many things including those outside of your control like your neighboring ip addresses. It’s not hard. Just super tedious.

        As others have said email is already federated but like most federated things to make it not a shit hole in today’s world is a lot of work.

      • CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m running a mail server with a .ml (mali) tld. With proper dmarc and dkim it gets through almost all spam filters (fuck whitelists) including gmails.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think that is an EEE attempt on email. What is (I think) an indirect EEE (I mean we’d be mad at them if they didn’t do it) is requiring strict adherence to DNSSEC/SPF/DKIM/DMARC. With the requirements changing very often it’s hard as a regular guy running an email server to keep your mail from ending up in spam folders on the big providers.

        What I want to know though, is why does my mail from a domain with properly configured SPF/DKIM/DNSSEC and DMARC end up in spam, and so much spam not? :P

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d argue they’d have 90% of the users anyways, it’s better to allow those users to be tempted by the more free alternative, than just make our own walled garden