This image was created by /u/kuebic@discuss.tchncs.de for this comment here: https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/21735989. I had encouraged them to post it somewhere, but as far as I can tell, they never did.

Panel 1: “Installing Windows 20 years ago” screenshot of install wizard with just a couple buttons
Panel 2: “Installing Linux 20 years ago” screenshot of a busy command line
Panel 3: “Installing Windows today” screenshot of a busy command line
Panel 4: “Installing Linux today” screenshot of install wizard with just a couple buttons

  • BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    My favorite conspiracy of the moment is that Microsoft intentionally does this New Coke thing and then they will roll out actually good Windows and make all of DA MONY AND KEEL DA LEENOOCKS DIZIZZ. But it’s Microsoft, so the long game will go on forever and there will be no pay off. Also - Mint is soooo gooooood to use compared to Win11

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      People forgot already…

      EVERY SECOND WINDOWS IS GOOD Win XP good, Vista bad, 7 good, 8 bad, 10 good, 11 bad, 12 good?

      Only this time around Linux got to the point where everyday users can switch and only run into debiliating problems twice a year, so MS is losing customers.

        • Demdaru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You say so yet 10 is fast, convienient and easy to use. Wouldn’t call it better than 7, but it was good.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nah, 10 is the primordial ooze from which all the current vile evil coming out of microsoft was formed.

            7 was faster, more convenient, less in your way, and just overall a superior product. No microsoft OS has even equaled what 7 was, much less be superior to it.

            • Demdaru@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Straight up said I wouldn’t call 10 better than 7. So what’s your point? 10 is, overall, good OS. Not best, not great, good.

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Straight up said I wouldn’t call 10 better than 7. So what’s your point?

                10 is the primordial ooze from which all the current vile evil coming out of microsoft was formed.

                • Demdaru@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Agree to disagree. 10 is fast, reliable and convienient. I agree it served as a sandbox for all the shit they crammed into 12, but it doesn’t change anything.

                  Still would prefer 7. Kinda loved 7.

                  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    And thats where we can come together. 7 was the best, the peak of microsofts excellence.

                    I’d probably still be running it today if I could, but it died, and my choice was Windows 11 or Linux… so I went linux, and never looked back.

            • Demdaru@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I feel like the very moment we go for any linux aimed at being lightweight, windows loses due to cramming cramming as much compatibility and tools as is possible inside.

              …and also you got me intrested in AntiX. I have old laptop that struggles even with Debian…wonder if that would work on it.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think it was Windows 2000 I had to install on a laptop for someone…

              This was 20+ years ago, so I dont remember the details…but i think there was like 11-13 floppies for the install that I had at the time? All of them OEM floppies… I think from microsoft, but maybe from the laptop OEM?.. and every time I ran the installer another disk would fail, and i’d have to go online and find that disk image and burn it to a replacement floppy. It was the worst OS install experience of my entire life, lol. I think by the time I was done I had replaced all but the first oem disk.

        • Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe you had a specific experience with It, but XP was and is considered universally a good windows version, compared to its predecessors and the posterior Vista. Only losing to windows 7 when it launched.

          • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Security was awful, multi user wasn’t, windows started the Microsoft id program with it, they lied about removing programs with an apllication that only hid them, they tied music downloads to explorer only, and that’s only the tip of the iceberg.

            It was a nasty looking mess, got hacked in 10 minutes if you put it on the internet until service pack 3, and in person it wouldn’t last 3 minutes.

            That’s leaving out the crazy licensing programs they introduced.

            It was really, really bad. But since a lot of people knew nothing before it, they look back at it with rose colored glasses. It was truly garbage.

            • Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yes it had very bad flaws, which didn’t discourage its wide range of use. One can say it’s not objectively good, but it’s subjectively not bad.

              As I answered below, it was part of the “good guys” versions of windows, not receive popular backlash like windows ME, 8 and 11

            • Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nothing of the sort, just said it based on the general usage, for all the flaws it had, It was, undeniably a very popular and used piece of software.

              At the time of its peak, it was not universally bashed against like Windows ME, 8 or Vista. It was well received like windows 95, 7 and10

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is there any coke alternative that’s almost as good and in some regard better, but for free?

      • axx@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Amusingly, Ubuntu Cola is pretty good.

        Lots of smaller, independent brands make nice cola, like Fritz-Kola in Germany or Breizh Cola in France. Don’t expect to find them at your local hole in the wall though.

        • systemglitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          And here I like RC cola because it tastes to completely different than coke. I find it to be the most distant from coke flavour of all the colas I’ve had

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’ve cared about the shareholders over the customers for way too long. Enshittyfication isnt a strategy, it’s a symptom of promising infinitive growth.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I bought Pepsi after a long time of drinking almost no sodas, and none of big-brand ones (and I prefer Pepsi to Coke generally). It was somewhat of a shock as to how loaded it was with caffeine and sugar. Next time I’ll rather get store-brand soda that’s five times cheaper and has barely any sugar and no caffeine, even if it’s blander in taste.