The European Parliament voted on Wednesday to refer the EU-Mercosur trade agreement to the EU Court of Justice, a move that significantly delays the deal and could potentially derail its final approval.

As expected, the vote was tight, with 334 MEPs in favour of the referral, 324 against, and 11 abstaining.

The agreement signed on 17 January, which will create a free trade area of over 700 million people, is controversial across Europe, and several countries like France and Poland have opposed it.

The agreement’s advocates consider it a major opportunity for European industries and a way to bolster the EU’s geostrategic position, especially at a time of constant friction with the United States. But it has also drawn outrage from farmers worried about the implications of cheap and lower-standard food from South American countries flooding into the European market.

  • rom255@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Make Europe Small Again” I guess. This deal was a shimmer of hope in these challenging times.

    • Gulliver@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mercosur is a hope for Blackrock which own most of the big food company in south america, but death for our farmers.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    worried about the implications of cheap and lower-standard food

    So, why didn’t they listen? It is a clearly understandable concern, isn’t it?

    • the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are many quotas on agricultural products from south America to the point where major South American agro exports can only supply 1-10% of total current EU consumption tariff free. I believe honey was highest around 10% of total EU demand with most being around 1-3% such as for beef. For most agro products, South America exports more stuff to Europe than the tariffs would cover

      To mee, it seems these quotes probably mean there will be little change in agro exports from South America since the tariff on those items have only been slightly relieved. We should definitely protect EU farmers but we shouldn’t hold up the rest of the economy for them.

      • farsinuce@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes. For beef, it is 1.5% of annual EU consumption that would be tariff-free, if I remember correctly.

        • the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, obviously they don’t want competition… That’s fair enough but they aren’t the only people that live in the EU. They are already subsidised and there are provisions for more subsidies if needed.

          If the deal improves trade and grows the EU economy, we can afford to subsidise them more in future when needed

          • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Thank you for repeating your own opinion.

            But how does it seem to the protesting farmers?

            • the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Thank you for repeating your question.

              They are obviously not happy. Perhaps you could outline their perspective so we can have a discussion

    • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They did listen, for 25 years actually. But apparently no concession to the concerns of the farmers can be big enough.