• Thomas H Jones@blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    @theHRguy@lemmy.world

    Reason I don’t have any cameras is the whole “I want to wholly control my data” thing. There’s just no good reason a “cloud” service can’t use Client-Side encryption, other than they want to leave open the possibility of selling you out.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why not use CCTV and then you get the benefit of cameras without the cloud…

      • B-TR3E@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        What exactly is the “benefit of cameras”? I never had any “security cameras” and my wife would probably call a psychiatrist if I wanted one. Also, nobody I know has one.

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I use offline CCTV for this reason. I’m hacking together an old IP webcam for real-time viewing my front door from my phone with open source software, but that’ll be view only, not record.

      • Thomas H Jones@blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        @BanMe@lemmy.world

        Storage reliability/off-siting.

        Scenario:

        Someone throws something flammable at your front door (maybe even as innocuous as the classic “flaming bag of poo” prank. Nobody’s home to notice. Fire burns the house down. Prankster was careless and caught on camera. Do you get footage from a slagged CCTV system?

        • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Just because there is a scenario where it won’t work doesn’t mean that it’s not useful. Every security system has some kind of scenario where it fails.

          • Thomas H Jones@blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            @SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world

            Yup, but if you can reduce or remove failure-cases without reducing security or making other sacrifices it makes little sense not to.

            A system with local cache (hedging against Internet outages), batteries (hedging against power failures) and strong CSE (hedging against opt-out third-party access to your data) provides a significantly higher quality solution than something like Ring or even standard CCTV.