• Wodge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Based on what? 4 games? Acti/Blizzard aren’t the publishing powerhouse they once were. They have Warcraft, Diablo, CoD and Hearthstone. Yes, there is also King, but all that is f2p mobile jank.

    • imaBEES@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apparently King is the money-printing machine that this deal was primarily about, all the Activision/Blizzard games are just a bonus

      • Wodge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t doubt this to be true, but all the attempts to block the deal have centered around Call of Duty.

        • Eochaid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s only because of Sony. They’re the only ones that kept bringing up CoD - accusing, without evidence, that MS is going to make it exclusive to Xbox.

          Phil Spencer / Microsoft only ever talked about CoD in response to Sony’s allegations - and that was to say they have no intention of taking CoD from PS and to offer long term deals as assurance.

          And furthermore, to confirm that because they’re a distant #3 in the market, cutting off Activision’s biggest game from the current market leader would be a great way to cut off a big chunk of their new acquisition’s revenue.