The top speeder, who drives often in southern Brooklyn, has been caught speeding by school zone speed cameras more than 1,000 times since mid-2023, according to new data from Transportation Alternatives and Families For Safe Streets.
Most state laws around camera fines are way softer than those from tickets issued by people. For one a camera cannot identify the driver of the vehicle so it’s not technically a traffic violation on anyone’s license, it’s a fine levied against the owner of the vehicle.
These laws restrict what actions they can take against the vehicle owner because there’s no proof they were driving.
If you have no idea who’s using your car to break laws repeatedly, shouldn’t it be impounded?
Weird how a photograph wouldn’t be able to identify a driver… sure, you can cast doubt, but unless you’re wearing a mask it still should hold up in court…?
I thought the idea was that I’m the USA you have the right to face your accuser in a court of law. If a citation is issued automatically, who is your accuser? (I AM NOT DEFENDING THIS POSITION.)
Most state laws around camera fines are way softer than those from tickets issued by people. For one a camera cannot identify the driver of the vehicle so it’s not technically a traffic violation on anyone’s license, it’s a fine levied against the owner of the vehicle.
These laws restrict what actions they can take against the vehicle owner because there’s no proof they were driving.
If you have no idea who’s using your car to break laws repeatedly, shouldn’t it be impounded?
Weird how a photograph wouldn’t be able to identify a driver… sure, you can cast doubt, but unless you’re wearing a mask it still should hold up in court…?
I thought the idea was that I’m the USA you have the right to face your accuser in a court of law. If a citation is issued automatically, who is your accuser? (I AM NOT DEFENDING THIS POSITION.)