As straight as he is? He’s been caught out lying on multiple occasions.
There’s no reason to believe they’re ‘ramping up’ beyond paranoia. He did some things that were both unusual for a politician and that people wildly disapproved of this week. When should the press have reported that news? His latest lies were discovered this week. Again, when should the press have reported them, such that it would meet with your approval?
Before he was party leader? They should’ve reported on the activities of some guy in case he eventually became leader?
The other occasions of his lying were the hypnoboobs thing and his subsequent false claims (that it was a sting and that he disavowed it immediately, both false).
Ok, so then when he became party leader?
The ‘hypnoboob’ thing wasn’t in any way a lie now was it. And again, it’s of zero consequence.
I think you’re gasping at straws here, especially if you compare his record to literally any other party leader. Who’s your guy?
Suspiciously exactly the amount of time it takes before he’s involved in a high profile election? I’m minded not to believe in coincidences like this when there’s a much more likely explanation.
As straight as he is? He’s been caught out lying on multiple occasions.
There’s no reason to believe they’re ‘ramping up’ beyond paranoia. He did some things that were both unusual for a politician and that people wildly disapproved of this week. When should the press have reported that news? His latest lies were discovered this week. Again, when should the press have reported them, such that it would meet with your approval?
They should’ve reported it four years ago, when it happened, maybe?
Which other occasions?
Before he was party leader? They should’ve reported on the activities of some guy in case he eventually became leader?
The other occasions of his lying were the hypnoboobs thing and his subsequent false claims (that it was a sting and that he disavowed it immediately, both false).
Ok, so then when he became party leader?
The ‘hypnoboob’ thing wasn’t in any way a lie now was it. And again, it’s of zero consequence. I think you’re gasping at straws here, especially if you compare his record to literally any other party leader. Who’s your guy?
Because they didn’t know about it! They have to research and check this stuff and that takes time.
Suspiciously exactly the amount of time it takes before he’s involved in a high profile election? I’m minded not to believe in coincidences like this when there’s a much more likely explanation.
Journalist doing their job is the most likely explanation.
No, the explanation of the timing of the piece, not its existence.