• Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Lmao yes it fuxking is. Zionism is quite literally why Israel was established in Palestine instead of a ton of other proposed locations…

        • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          11 months ago

          None of which I mentioned. My comment was on the definition of colonialism. You imagined what is in your head.

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Don’t be facetious. Zionism is colonialism, just with Jewish seasoning.

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                You’re trying to be funny in pretending to not understand Zionism is a form of colonialism. Your semantic trick in “I’m talking about colonialism” is just a joke to you. Or do you really not understand the subject? If you do, you’re ignoring the serious issue in order to be smug.

            • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              But it isn’t just colonialism. And my comment is solely upon the definition of colonialism not fitting the circumstances here. More Penal Colony for all the folks being deported from Germany, France, Italy, and Russia especially. I’d suggest it was more like Australia colonization when the deported criminals, others, and inconvenient poors were not really in charge of the decision. So while yes, the set up is typical colonialism, it isn’t really the Israelis that did it, they are just a bunch of People deported to this location that are using violence to claim their turf, but they were not really in the “go there and take land” meeting. So it is more the WWII Allies that did the colonization. The Jews simply went there to get away from the discrimination and violence in the allied countries plus those still alive from the “liberated” axis ones.
              So I remain behind my original statement, weird definition of colonialism.

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                So it is more the WWII Allies that did the colonization

                That’s who people blame, yes. The British, particularly, are the ones who created Israel.

                And I don’t want you to get some wires crossed here, or to be performing some conflation, but no one other than anti-semites blames Jews in general for this, or even the innocent Jewish civilians living in Israel.

                It is the Israeli state, specifically, the IDF, who are perpetuating the settler colonial vision now. Britain can be blamed for starting it, and the rest of the West can be blamed for helping support it, but it is still a program of moving people into an area while displacing the natives. Colonialism.

                • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You again insist upon off topic. I made no such suggestion nor in fact any comment involving most of your post.

                  • irmoz@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    You again insist upon off topic

                    This is not off-topic. You said “funny definition for colonialism”, implying Israel does not fit the definition of colonialism. This inevitably invites people to dispute this, and describe why indeed Israel is colonialist. Such responses are obviously on topic. Don’t try and weasel out of this.

                    I made no such suggestion nor in fact any comment involving most of your post.

                    No such suggestion of… what??? Why be so vague? You haven’t responded to anything here.

                    Israel is a settler-colonial state. Zionism is the destruction of Palestine to create Israel in its place. Do you dispute that?