• Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 days ago

    Makes about as much sense as people who think bisexuality excludes trans and enbys

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Bi-” doesn’t exclude them, but “pan-” exists to explicitly include them. Those aren’t the same thing.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its a meaningless distinction. We have more important fucking things to fight than whether or not you like old Queer terminology.

    • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I once knew a lady who thought pansexual meant “everything,” and specifically actual animals. I had to explain that it’s just bisexual but more.