• mastertigurius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      25 天前

      What would be the priority from a business perspective? Saving customers the cost of a disc drive, or saving the company the cost of shifting production over to a proprietary thumb drive, most likely costing several times the price per unit of a disc?

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 天前

        I think the priority for the business is what people will buy. PCs don’t have disc readers as standard anymore. Now the barrier to entry for physical media is either pay more for a thumb drive or pay a lot more for a disc reader.

        What if they adopted the C02 canister model. Slightly joking here, but why not treat the thumb drives as a recoverable container you can get a rebate for reusing?

    • rozodru@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 天前

      they cost about the same though. An Asus slim external 8x DVD usb 2.0 writer costs $50. a 256gb thumb drive costs $50. And i’m using 256GB as an example for modern games that can potentially be well over 100gb. Add to the fact said DVD drive is going to last a lot longer than a USB thumb drive. those thumb drives have a lifespan of like 5 years.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 天前

        In this specific case, that’s not apples to apples since most of the games on GOG are very small.

        It’s kind of hilarious to imagine, but I can imagine doing a “BYO thumb drive” sale for physical media. They could even mail it back in the big box