inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months agoHey media, stop bullying women who refuse to marry Republicanswww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square200fedilinkarrow-up1718arrow-down137
arrow-up1681arrow-down1external-linkHey media, stop bullying women who refuse to marry Republicanswww.salon.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square200fedilink
minus-squareLiz@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32arrow-down1·10 months agoOnly if you consider the word “who” to not be a qualifier.
minus-squareTheLurker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down3·edit-29 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down16·10 months agoThat’s a fair point. So you’re saying it can be taken in two different ways…
minus-squareTheLurker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·edit-29 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareBreadstickNinja@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·10 months agoNo, not even a little bit. “Who” is the subject of the relative clause. “Whom” would be completely incorrect.
minus-squareTheLurker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-29 months agodeleted by creator
Only if you consider the word “who” to not be a qualifier.
deleted by creator
That’s a fair point.
So you’re saying it can be taken in two different ways…
deleted by creator
No, not even a little bit. “Who” is the subject of the relative clause. “Whom” would be completely incorrect.
deleted by creator