• Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Exactly. They would have to rewrite all the code in order to make it proprietary. AGPL license ensures that not even an instance owner can (legally) change the code of their own instance without releasing the modified source code.

    We need to make sure that any apps that are created for Lemmy, also have a Copyleft license. At the very least they should be Free Software (which doesn’t seem to be guaranteed sadly, since most people don’t know what that means).

    • funkyb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Created for Lemmy” isn’t really a thing, all you need is to implement the ActivityPub protocol. Whether or not it has any relationship to Lemmy has no bearing on if it can talk to instances using Lemmy’s implementation.

      • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see, but apps are already being created specifically for using Lemmy. Like Jerboa. So there must be a reason why people want to use them instead of using apps for Mastodon?

        • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mastodon mobile apps and Lemmy mobile apps are not compatible with each other afaik. The Lemmy API is different to the Mastodon API. Their communication protocol between instances is ActivityPub.