The awesome Taylor Lorenz reports this on Mastadon. Highly recommend to follow her if you like these updates about what’s going on.

    • starlinguk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Rowling became a billionaire by writing popular books and selling the movie rights. She’s a scummy person, obviously, but she didn’t become rich by being one.

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah you definitely can become a billionaire without being a scummy person, just not trough business. You need to be an artist or athlete.

        • Zana
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Definitely not going to be a CEO without being a piece of shit. You need that lack of ethics to make it that high.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You can literally start your own company and assign yourself CEO. It’s probably all of a filing fee away. It’s easy to become a C-suite.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Which means you’re born into a weird sociopathic upbringing. Very fee born into wealth see any issues with it and even then, it tends to be short lived. One of the Johnson and Johnson heirs put out a documentary, but not much after that.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        As you say, she’s a scummy person, so you have no way of knowing that she only became a billionaire because of the books.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most of the Harry Potter stories are stolen/copies of either existing young adult novels or existing mythology. There’s very little original material or concepts. All writers borrow from other writers, but Rowling is just barely better than a plagiarist.