• Chetzemoka
      link
      6
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yeah but I didn’t get my first cell phone until 2003 cause all these young kids I hung out with at work wouldn’t stop bothering me about it lol. “We want to text you!” Brats.

      • Apathy Tree
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Back then that translated directly to “we want to cost you money” because you’d need the unlimited plans for text messages if you sent more than like, what, 20 a month? 50? I don’t recall but it wasn’t a lot compared to today where that’s the primary means of communication for the vast majority of people, so we have multiple platforms to do it and lol charging per text.

        Oh and unlimited didn’t include web browsing, that was separate. And only if you had a compatible phone.

        • Chetzemoka
          link
          16 months ago

          Iirc, it was like $0.10/message? So yeah, the brats were costing me money lol. And I was definitely on a T9 flip phone, none of this internet nonsense.

    • @Audrey0nne@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      736 months ago

      Can we not with this? Whether or not this is a verifiable event is irrelevant to the entertainment value it possesses unless you are the type of person who has to witness every event in order to extract some value therein, in which case look away from the screen and touch some grass.

      • @jve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        I’m confused. What is it that you’re complaining about?

        Do you think this shouldn’t have been posted? Are there comments on this post that I can’t see?

        • Glifted
          link
          fedilink
          266 months ago

          I would bet real money that this exchange never happened

          That’s the comment he’s replying to. It is possible you can’t see it

          • @jackoneill@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            166 months ago

            Do you know why this happens? I don’t see that comment you quoted, I only see the reply to it as a root level comment. I’ve been noticing this all over the place, where a top level comment is clearly replying to something I cannot see.

            • @tenacious_mucus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I have noticed this same issue for a while now. Just checked my user block list and the true top level commenter, metallic_substance, is not on my list…i dont actually have that many users on my block list, so i didnt think that was ever the issue. But, not knowing WTF most of the comments are about is really annoying.

              • @jackoneill@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                I haven’t blocked anyone yet so it’s definitely not that but it’s like every thread send to be missing comments without even telling me it’s missing comments so I have to deduce it from the missing context. It’s infuriating. It’s making this platform very irritating to use

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        -16 months ago

        It’s not funny at all. We could text in the 90’s. What supposed to be funny about it?

      • @kewko@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        The fact that this is not a link and there’s no standard way of making it a link is honestly a big problem for us