The personnel halting and stimulation response rifle (PHASR) is a prototype non-lethal laser dazzler developed by the US Department of Defense.

Its purpose is to temporarily disorient and blind a target.

Blinding laser weapons have been tested in the past, but were banned under the 1995 UN Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons, which the United States acceded to on 21 January 2009. The PHASR rifle, a low-intensity laser, is not prohibited under this regulation, as the blinding effect is intended to be temporary. It also uses a two-wavelength laser

      • Steve
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        “Less lethal” please

        • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Why use a laser when they can just shoot bean bags at peoples faces and explode their eyeballs that way.

          • Steve
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Its a lot cheaper, you can use any old shotgun

          • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Hell if you can just convince a group of right-wingers that the protesters are communist crisis actors or whatever you don’t even need to bust out the riot gear, they’ll sort it out for you!

    • FireTower@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      The National Institute of Justice recently awarded ScorpWorks $250,000 to make an advanced prototype that will add an eye-safe laser range finder into PHaSR. Systems such as PHaSR have historically been too powerful at close ranges and ineffective but eye-safe at long ranges. The next prototype is planned to include the addition of the eye-safe range finder and is planned for completion in March 2006.

      Based on the article from Defense Review and the drop off of serious articles discussing it I’m guessing that the range difficulties made this unreasonable for police applications.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’m glad they’re not effective for riot control. Using these types of weapons against civilians is dystopian.

        • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Using these types of weapons against civilians is dystopian.

          Tear gas, batons, fire hoses, pepper balls, and shotguns with bean bags are all still ok though, right?

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      This was/is a thing, but it isn’t made to blind you permanently. It wouldn’t take too much power, really. 8 18650 batteries would probably let you just hold down the trigger for 4 hours non stop.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Its purpose is to temporarily disorient and blind a target.

    I can do the same thing with a laser pointer toy bought for $0.99 at a 99 Cent Store. And it even fits in a pocket without looking like a plasma cannon from Halo.

  • seathru@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why is it so… bulbous? Did someone look at the tactical tuna and think “Hell yeah, turn that up to 11!”?