• distantsounds@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d suggest reading the article. It’s here in the comments several times. The video of the hearing is well worth watching and pretty significant. That video is also here in the comments.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes a person specifically employed to find information who then reports said information is 100% the same as dumb shit you said on a playground.

        Exactly the same.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You have definitely not seen the hearing and it is beyond weird that you’d pretend otherwise on the internet.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                The evidence and witness info provided have the committee members calling for a select committee with subpoena powers.

                When Grusch said “I can’t say that here” that was never going to be the end of that discussion

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    A select committee is not “every committee by default.” A select committee is a specific committee.

                    Also you may want to revisit the last sentence of paragraph 1.

                    And no, the entire hearing was credible.

                    Frankly if it’s nothing, you don’t have to give a shit. The members of Congress think it’s something, and I agree with them.