• BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    nice whataboutism, but this isn’t about the US, it’s about Argentina’s sordid past and its refusing to abide by its agreements to the IMF.

    nice try at deflection, though. there’s only so much you can blame others for your own failures.

    How is something that happened 80 years ago has anything to do with the current situation regarding the debt trap by the FM

    yet you used Operation Paperclip as a defense… so, which is it? you can’t have it both ways.

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      And why do you bring Argentina as if the US is free of guilt, you did much worse, and you talk to me about whatabutism when you didn’t even have any single consequence?

      It was not an agreement, it was a debt trap with a corrupt politician and an economic weaponization of debt, that is the only purpose of the IMF and you know it. It wasn’t our failure, it was something your country does to fuck everyone up.

      • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        And why do you bring Argentina as if the US is free of guilt, you did much worse, and you talk to me about whatabutism when you didn’t even have any single consequence?

        Argentina borrowed money from the IMF, not the US, so the US isn’t involved. You’re just attacking the US because you don’t have a defense for Argentina’s actions, and you think it will hurt my feelings. it’s a whataboutism.

        Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in “what about…?”) denotes in a pejorative sense a procedure in which a critical question or argument is not answered or discussed, but retorted with a critical counter-question which expresses a counter-accusation. From a logical and argumentative point of view it is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin ‘you too’, term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.

        It was not an agreement, it was a debt trap with a corrupt politician and an economic weaponization of debt, that is the only purpose of the IMF and you know it. It wasn’t our failure, it was something your country does to fuck everyone up.

        lmao, again, Argentina borrowed money from the IMF, not the US. get your facts straight, lol