• zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    In fairness, the Rita evacuation was an absolute shitshow and Harvey had a much lower casualty rate than mass-evacuations in other years.

    Sitting tight through a storm isn’t the worst idea, particularly if you’re in a sturdy facility with backup power like a school or stadium. Trying to pile out of town with another 4M people, particularly in this town, is nightmarish. And getting caught on a road in the middle of a flood/storm is even worse. Nevermind how this just kinda creates a blister in hotel prices and a rash of living-in-car homelessness for the duration and then another giant mess as people pile back into town.

    One might argue that this would encourage my city administrators to invest more aggressively in domestic shelters and other life-saving facilities. But we all know that’s not going to happen. In the meantime, I would not consider evacuation a given as a solution to an incoming storm.

    • viva_la_juche [they/them, any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Sitting tight through a storm isn’t the worst idea, particularly if you’re in a sturdy facility with backup power like a school or stadium

      Yeah that would be good if we organized stuff like that at a high level but I feel like most of the people I know just ride it out in their trailers or homes and hope they don’t take on water

      One might argue that this would encourage my city administrators to invest more aggressively in domestic shelters and other life-saving facilities

      Lol no for sure, texas’s solution to everything is “you should have had flood insurance”