• Blaze@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      The one criticism I saw from someone else was how dark it was. Like on a modern TV at home, some scenes were almost to dark to be seen

        • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Harry Potter? Yeah a lot of the scene from the later sequel is just way too dark it’s hard to even see what’s going on.

        • Blaze@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          HP movies colors are just so dark. It’s probably my biggest gripe with the movie. All joy and color is gone from movie 5.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s probably because it had to spend so much time on character history/relationship and world building to get people familiar with the scenario who didn’t read the books.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      My only complaint about it was that it was half a movie and it just randomly ended mid way through the story.

    • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not an opinion. It’s a fact. I watched the 1984 version, spice diver edit, after it. Sooo much better.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Whew that’s good to hear, I’m super hyped, got tickets for the 1st and managed to snag a dead center halfway back seat at my local theater.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      IMO the first one nails the spectacle that one imagines when reading Dune, but struggles to capture the book’s deeper meaning

      • aleph@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Very succinct summary, IMO.

        I like the movie but it does lose a lot by dropping the character’s inner monologues. I totally get why you’d do that for a film adaptation but the book characters are so internal and introspective that you really get a sense of their mental subtlety and the labyrinthine nature of the political landscape that they inhabit. Then also of course is how Paul (and later Leto II) subjectively experience prescience.

        I’m hoping that Part Two really delves deeper into the psyches of both Paul and Jessica.

  • Blaze@reddthat.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Who here is planning on watching it? I’ll create the review thread later, but if someone wants to do it earlier, feel free

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have tickets for the advanced screening on the 25th at my local AMC lie-max. It was the only available theater for the advanced screening. Then I’m watching it again a week after general screening in true IMAX.

  • RandomStickman@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really liked the first one. SO’s not really in to scifi so it mostly gone over their head. We’ll see if I get an opportunity to catch it in the cinema