• DominusOfMegadeusEnglish
    12•3 months ago

    I’m just gonna say it: Is anyone else not really interested in a show about Starfleet Academy? I’ll give it a shot, and it could be phenomenal, in which case I will enjoy watching it. But on the whole, that’s just not a setting that interests me in the slightest. I want Legacy.

      • @themokenEnglish
        6•3 months ago

        I’m okay with it. My problem with Disco is how high stakes breathless it is all the time, visiting the timeline with a lower stakes Academy lens could be cool. Being far future means it won’t be a TOS/TNG cameo fest (SNW’s biggest flaw) and I wouldn’t mind being able to do some actual character development on Tilly / other Disco crew if they weren’t just constantly in mortal danger.

        Of course it’ll probably end up being flashy bullshit again, but I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt for now.

        • @reddig33@lemmy.worldEnglish
          4•3 months ago

          Anything at season one of Discovery or before. Not really interested in the “super future” era.

    • BigfootEnglish
      5•3 months ago

      I’m not but I also was not interested in a show about a space station and that turned out to be my absolute favorite so I will judge it on its own merits.

    • @MisterD@lemmy.caEnglish
      0•3 months ago

      They will drag in all of Tilly’s friends and STD storylines… in the 31st century???

      Come on… Starfleet Academy is going to suck.

  • @USSBurritoTruckMEnglish
    9•3 months ago

    I kinda hope that “Legacy” does get off the ground, if for no other reason than that all the folks champing at the bit for it will be confronted by the fact that once you take out the TNG cast, what you’re left with is show created by the same dude who was showrunner for season two of PIC and who thinks owning a BttF DeLorean is a personality trait, featuring the Scrappy Doo of Star Trek.

    • @askryanEnglish
      4•3 months ago

      But what about all the interesting ideas they’ve pitched for Legacy? Like…the ideas that were come up with. That involved things. You know the ones.

      • @USSBurritoTruckMEnglish
        5•3 months ago

        Yeah, right now the idea seems to begin and end with more Trek by Terry Matalas, and if that’s all they’re bringing to the table…I’m good.

        Even though I do like Seven, Raffi, and Crash LaForge, the ongoing adventures of Jack Crusher does not appeal to me in the slightest.

    • HandlesEnglish
      3•3 months ago

      Thank you. It was getting stuffy in here.

      • @USSBurritoTruckMEnglish
        5•3 months ago

        Who’s angry? I just don’t think he’s a particularly good showrunner, and if not for people being blinded by his over reliance on fan service and nostalgia, it wouldn’t even be a question.

  • Value SubtractedMAEnglish
    8•3 months ago

    The question mentioned “Legacy,” but the answer didn’t even reference that project indirectly.

    • Bill Mason 🖖 🎶 📖 🥅OP
      11•3 months ago

      @ValueSubtracted @startrek Yeah, just general talk of spacing out future projects. But since it’s the only potential future project we know of (I think?) it’s a straw to grab. 😂

      Personally I wouldn’t be shocked if the idea dies because people move on to other projects and then if/when Paramount decided to do it you suddenly can’t get the band back together on the timeline they want.

    • @StillPaisleyCatEnglish
      6•3 months ago

      Actually, TrekMovie makes the case that the references in the reply to the need to ‘time things out’ for the franchise was the answer. I would parse that as their having other Star Trek franchise products ahead in the queue.

      The person asking really let Cheeks off the hook though with their final question being, “Is Trek still a priority for the company?”.

      No matter how specific the preceding preamble was to Legacy, the question they got to was super general and let Cheeks take it wherever he wanted.