• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      For the worse.

      Not necessarily.

      But we’re going to have to deal with the basic issue of deceiving someone with AI, and if any AI generated thing should be labeled or not as such.

      Basically, a legislative fix, and not just a free market free for all.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        How do you enforce labelling when there will never be a way to reliably test if something was ai generated?

        Basic is not a word that fits the situation.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          How do you enforce labelling when there will never be a way to reliably test if something was ai generated?

          If the icon is not there and then it’s determined that it’s AI generated, as it was with that British royal family picture the other day; crowd sourced.

          • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I am not understanding you. Or perhaps you’re not understanding me.

            Firstly, the British royal family photo was not ai generated.

            If you can’t find a way to test if something is ai generated, who decides what is or isn’t ai generated?