• stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      That shows Morning Consults sources are 100% online… which means their ‘likely voter’ claims can’t be validated by their polling methods. All the orange (landline) in that graph is what these ‘likely voter’ polls are talking about, because that method can reliably be used to validate identity and ‘likely voter’ status.

      So I guess +1 for showing Morning Consults is an online poller, not landline, but -10 for thinking online polling isn’t a joke and another -10 for not understanding how ‘likely voters’ are validated.

      • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I always think it’s funny when people don’t understand statistics and they think poll results are just reported straight up and not weighted for a bunch of factors

        • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Oh, didn’t realize I was speaking to an expert that understands ‘weighting for a bunch of factors’ ;)

          By all means please explain the methods for maintaining accuracy in online polls.

            • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              6 months ago

              Weighting to reflect your population is just basic stats though

              lol- my dude… wish I could share how funny this conversation is with you, but that’s what makes it so funny ;)

              • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 months ago

                Sticking your fingers in your ears and refusing to learn doesn’t make it funny, it’s just sad. And using all the basic suggestions after you googled “how do I act condescending on social media” also makes it sad, but you do you bud

                • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Seriously- loving this. Tell me about the ‘bunch of factors’ and ‘basic stats’ you’re so knowledgeable about weighting ;) Soon though, 'bout to head out for the day.

                  • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    It’s funny how pathetic people act after you present them with evidence that they are wrong. This is some Reddit shit though. Most interactions I’ve had on Lemmy are better than this

                  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I can honestly say I feel marginally dumber having reading your condescending comment chain here acting like you have some privileged knowledgeable nobody else does, all the while somebody is actually genuinely responding with information explaining why the polls are the way they are, and you act like a pompous jackal.

                    If you aren’t trolling, I just feel sorry for you.