• Ogmios
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1093 months ago

      The SWAT team was looking for guns and other material related to a carjacking that had occurred that morning.

      So it wasn’t for the airpods themselves, but rather airpods being in the stolen car was how they attempted to find the carjackers. While the police definitely screwed up, the article author is going out of their way to create the most rage inducing headline possible.

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        763 months ago

        Eh…

        The air pods did lead them to that street, then the cops just apparently picked a random house to raid.

        So it’s accurate, but it would have been best to add “following armed carjacking”.

        But the real issue is the overuse of raids and judges being way to fucking lenient with warrants.

        Both things Biden claims he reigned in two years ago via executive order. I know because whenever I point out how not enough is done about our policing issues, people keep telling me everything is fine and Biden already fixed this and I should stop worrying about it.

        Clearly it’s still happening and people are being traumatized. Luckily this time the police didn’t murder anyone at least.

        But none of these cops or the judge who signed a bullshit warrant will ever be held accountable.

        • @PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          It’s not accurate, it uses nearby apple devices. If your iPhone picks up the air pods then it will point to an area where your iPhone is located. It can’t pinpoint the exact location. This wasn’t disclosed to the judge when the warrant was applied for. The police omitted critical information because they knew their warrant would be denied. Hopefully, a federal court will make things right, unfortunately, the police will keep their jobs.

        • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          113 months ago

          Clickbait? These people had their home broken into and ransacked by a bunch of goons pointing rifles at them for absolutely no reason other than incompetence. They didn’t even fix the damage they cause as noted at the end of the article.

    • @PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      323 months ago

      The majority of police departments are a misuse of public money. We need actual public safety and welfare.

    • @guacupado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      In Albuquerque 911 will tell you to find a station and put in a claim lol. These guys brought a whole team out.

  • @treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    883 months ago

    He hopes in the course of the lawsuit to better understand how county police decide when to deploy a SWAT team.

    “They probably have some kind of analytic multifactor test and they will fight tooth and nail to have that test not be exposed,” Schock says.

    There’s no shot the decision to send SWAT is anything other than if they feel like cosplaying that day.

  • Norgur
    link
    fedilink
    663 months ago

    They could just have… You know… Sent someone to have a look around the place. They’d probably just found the AirPods. Or… They could have… You know… Acted like humans instead of paranoid power tripping psychos and -and I know this sounds crazy, but hear me out - rung the doorbell and asked questions like “have you seen anything?”

    • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      The SWAT team was looking for guns and other material related to a carjacking that had occurred that morning.

      If they believed guns were possibly involved then it makes more sense to not just knock on the door.

      • @Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        They picked a house close to the AirPod location and raided it. Their actions are ridiculous, there was no good faith taking place here.

      • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Well there’s that whole pesky 2nd amendment in the US so guns are everywhere. Doesn’t give them an excuse to terrorize an innocent family.

        • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m just talking about their justification for SWAT and not knocking. Not trying to say they didn’t do a piss poor job here.

      • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If they believed guns were possibly involved then it makes more sense to not just knock on the door.

        Probably makes more sense to be sure who you are about to SWAT though. Maybe watch the house awhile from a distance? Scout it out? Otherwise demonstrate that you have a tactic other than not giving a shit about the people you claim to protect?

  • @Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    603 months ago

    How is proximity to recovered stolen goods, found in a public area, enough to gain a warrant for a (no knock?) SWAT raid?

  • SteefLem
    link
    fedilink
    English
    493 months ago

    Wauw. American cops are really scared of…everything aren’t they.

  • @Vigilante@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    A fuckin SWAT raid for a damn pair of AirPods bruh ? What the fuck ? Like what in the actual fuck ? Can i get a swat in here because i lost one of my buds somewhere and maybe they can shoot up the cusions to find em ?

    • @JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      Headline is slightly misleading, it was that a pair of carjackers stole a car that had AirPods within it so the police used the Find My location of those AirPods to therefore believe they could sent SWAT around to this lady’s address.

      • @Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Because it is difficult to call in whom lives at a home or see a car.

        They picked a random house near the iPod location and assaulted it like a bunch of amateur goons. The headline is misleading, but the police are guilty of multiple crimes and should all be facing ACA charges. Every single one of them.

  • @nul9o9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    293 months ago

    Getting told to fuck off by the police, or having them send a swat team for you when your property is stolen.

  • @Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    203 months ago

    The bipartisan police state everyone. We need to pass electoral reform so we can choose to be free.

    Switching away from first past the post voting makes third parties viable and eliminates the spoiler effect. Just search for videos on FPTP voting if you want an explanation on how and why first past the post voting makes third parties not viable.

    Electoral reform is possible in each individual state (for now), we dont need federal reform! Maine and Alaska have already passed electoral reform.

    So what’s the hold up with the rest of the states? Consider starring a campaign to chanfe how we vote in your own state! Force our representatives to compete with fresh outside ideas. We deserve the best representation, not excuses.

    • Liz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      I don’t believe voting reform alone will solve the two party problem, since we continue to have single-winner elections. We will need to push through voting reform and add-on some kind of proportional representation (my favorite is Sequential Proportional Approval Voting). Then we’ll have a real chance for minor parties to have representation in office, instead of just at the bottom of the ballot box.

    • @Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      I wonder if FPTP and/or winner take all elections inevitably lead to some kind of tyranny by the majority.

      • Veraxus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        “Tyranny of the majority” is nothing more than an anti-democratic authoritarian dog whistle.

        FPTP is easily manipulated, abused, and prone to corruption… allowing a MINORITY to seize power from the majority by limiting/controlling the people’s options.

      • @PotatoKat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Except in the US a tyranny of the majority isn’t even what is happening. All the shitty things that are happening are wanted by a minority of the population.