Came across this interesting article. But what do you all think?

  • mark@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Eh. These sorts of metrics aren’t always accurate. And the source company did the study in 2016, which was a very very different internet, and doesn’t go into detail about how they were able to determine this number. I would take that with a grain of salt. I agree that just having a notice somewhere is better than not, though.

    • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure, I was just curious and looked it up, that’s the first link I saw. I guess the question is — is it better to theoretically annoy real users who aren’t using JS (and how many are there) or is it better to frustrate and annoy lazy spammers (and how many are there?). On my own sites I really rarely get non-spam email. I’d be fine making a random 10-45 second timer on my contact forms doing this, no one needs to contact me in under 10 seconds on my websites.