Between 30 to 50 people swarmed the Nordstrom at the Westfield Topanga Mall in Woodland Hills, making off with thousands of dollars worth of luxury handbags and high-end clothing, an LAPD spokesman told NBC News.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    LOL why are they calling it “shoplifting” this isn’t some bored kid stuffing a shirt under their clothes. This is an organized raid.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      They even mention the use of bear spray. That alone turned it from being shoplifting to a robbery. Since now there’s the inclusion of violence and/or threat of violence

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wrong. The second they used the bear spray it went from shoplifting to a robbery. Because now violence or threat of violence is involved.

        I’m no lawyer, but it might even be considered armed robbery depending on how the state views sprays.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m a lawyer and you’re absolutely right legally speaking. In the eyes of the police though, it’s shopifting, or at best like shoplifting+. The perpatrators had masks on and got away. The store is insured for the loss.

          Nobody is going to look hard for these people.

  • pizza-bagel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It makes me laugh how many people think this is a new development only in CA and in 2023.

    This happened back in the 90s to my mom while working retail. Like 10 people came in and carried off the furniture they had in the store, because they knew the employees were instructed not to do anything.

    Shit like this has been happening all over the US for decades, the media just decided it was the hot new topic to get more clicks recently. Even the Walgreens CEO who said theft was so awful they had to close a bunch of stores later admitted they “cried wolf”.

    Rich people love the idea that theft is out of control in the media because it gives them a talking point to keep us peasants in control. Starbucks was charged by the labor board for closing down unionizing stores under the guise of “safety concerns”. Starbucks isn’t the only place that has been pulling that shit.

    And that’s not to say I agree with 50 people bear spraying people and stealing luxury shit either. This isn’t someone stealing food from the grocery store to feed their kids. It wasn’t billionaires working in the store, it’s people working a shitty retail job for shitty pay no doubt. But it is a topic being overblown for rich people’s benefit.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The biggest theft is wage theft. But nobody cares because is ok to stole from someone that is poorer that you.

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        but what about

        No one cares about the fact that they stole some overpriced pirses dumbass, were calling them pieces of shit because they ran in and bear sprayed people who would have never intervened in the first place. The people doing this have no concept of class solidarity and the whole reason they’re stealing in the first place is for posturing, it has nothing to do with “sending a message”

    • quicksand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same energy as people bitching about the homeless in SF and Portland. It’s like have you seen our downtown bro, there’s a tent city

      • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Strongly considering buying property in Portland because values are depressed because of the propaganda/fear-mongering. I think there is a small, but legitimate risk that it eventually becomes true, though.

        • quicksand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Downtown Portland has gone to shit, no doubt about it. But there are problems in every city that needs addressing. For what it’s worth I’d move to Portland still, the area is beautiful and much better than the increasingly overpriced desert I’m living in

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you actually been to Portland? It’s not propaganda or fear-mongering. There are massive tent cities of homeless people under all of the major overpasses, and at a few random points throughout the city. It’s a very real problem.

    • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to work at a dollar store back in the day, and I was warned that this guy comes in every few weeks and grabs a bunch of jackets then runs out the back door.

      No shit like clockwork it happened.

      I was warned not to engage and just call the cops. My first time, I was in the back taking a shit in the bathroom next to the rear emergency exit. I heard the alarm go off and jumped up, pulled up my pants and ran out to catch him. He ran out back, I ran out after him. He pulled a gun on me and I learned my lesson. Let the dude have the jackets. Got it.

    • porkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t someone stealing food from the grocery store to feed their kids… But it is a topic being overblown for rich people’s benefit.

      How is it overblown? It is a real issue with law enforcement in America. People are being permitted to destroy and steal property. We need to get to the root cause of what’s going on their. It’s due to failures on multiple fronts. You can’t just say ignore it because capitalism bad. Capitalism is a founding principle of this country’s economy. You can’t play the card that these people are protesting corruption because others are enriching themselves by stealing goods. That’s not noble in any way and doesn’t help employees.

    • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s changed recently to be far more organized. Crime goes in cycles though, catalytic converter and retail rings are just the big ones right now.

  • nothing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s also “over $100k” if you believe that cheaply made stuff is worth that price.

      • Wilziac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        My Ex used to work in Saks 5th Avenue, so I would often browse around while waiting for them. I once saw a short sleeve button up shirt on the clearance rack that I really liked. It was $175 after the discount. I never seriously shopped in there after that.

      • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nordstrom will put high end goods near brands that are more affordable. It’s like having an expensive bottle of wine on the menu so the customer doesn’t feel so bad about paying 50 bucks. If you need to laugh go to a genuine luxury store and the prices are insane. Like $10k for a back pack nuts.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looks like run of the mill theft to me. Sure, perpetrated by a lot of people at once, but without proof of a legitimate business operating as a money laundering front for the proceeds of the fenced goods, this isn’t organized crime.

    • JasSmith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I’m poor so I’m not responsible for stealing luxury goods and bear spraying minimum wage security guards.”

      I grew up poor. I didn’t do this. Your comment is dripping with the implicit accusation that poor people are basically just animals. Incapable of controlling themselves when they see nice handbags.

      • Isaac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        71
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Poverty doesn’t affect everyone the same. To try to discount the fact that poverty increases crime just because you aren’t a criminal is ignoring the complexity of humanity.

        To say that this particular crime was caused by poverty also ignores the complexity of humanity.

        We can all speculate until we’re blue in the face, but I agree that lessening poverty will lessen crime of most types.

        • vector_zero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thing is, there’s a difference between stealing a loaf of bread and looting a Nordstrom and assaulting the guards.

          • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Stealing from wealthy corporations is an extremely valid and morally acceptable form of protest. Hell, it’s a morally good thing to do even if it’s not meant as a protest.

            I’m not going to defend assaulting the guards, though, except in the case of self-defense. Store security guards have no business using force against shoplifters, and most company policies align with that fact.

              • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Feel free to explain why it’s not objectively a good act to steal from the entities that themselves commit the overwhelming majority of theft, intentionally, systematically, and forcefully hold the majority of the worlds working population either in actual slavery, poverty, or at least unjustifiable and extreme financial insecurity that technically isn’t poverty because government definitions of poverty are patently absurd, and and who are actively and knowingly driving us towards towards the collapse of the environment and the greater part of biological life itself.

                I’ll give you a hint: you’re actually just wrong by any standard that values human life in any way.

            • norbert@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah have you ever been in a Nordstrom? Fuck that place, snatch all the handbags you can and sell them on eBay I don’t really care.

              You shouldn’t bear spray security and maybe they should be charged for it but at least he wasn’t shot or something.

              • keeb420@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                i feel bad for the employees who had to deal with it and clean up after and the guards that got assaulted. i dont feel bad for the above store level managers and execs who have to deal with this shit.

            • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              1 year ago

              So all those people who work for a living and contribute to society, who save up that money to buy those handbags are just schmucks? Give me a break.

              • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                23
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 year ago
                1. People that work for a living do not shop at Nordstrom’s

                2. The items were stolen from Nordstrom’s, not individuals

                • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What a tacitly disingenuous statement. What the fuck are you sniffing “people who work don’t shop there.”

                  Your edgy 14 your old comment is ridiculous. What a jibe on the rich you just did!

                  The items were stolen period. Fact. A crime. Never mind your rage against capitalism. Commit a crime and get put in jail.

                  Commit a bodily crime over property, get put in the ground.

              • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You know someone is a shit person when they equate income with value as a human being.

                Even if that were a valid take, almost every working poor person contributes more to society than nearly any rich person does, and would therefore still have more human worth.

            • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              There was also needless destruction. I can see breaking a glass case to grab some watches, but it appears that there was also destruction for the sake of destruction (at least in the video I watched).

              • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Who actually gives a fuck about corporate property being destroyed? These companies commit more theft from their workers than all other theft combined. They objectively deserve this.

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is a difference, that doesn’t mean they don’t have similar root causes.

          • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Everybody has different needs, but imo if you work as a security guard for a place like this AND take it seriously you not only signed up for violence but you deserve it. These companies are robbing us blind of good health, personal space and time on the planet- why defend that?

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          TFA even mentions that one of the getaway cars was a BMW. Undoubtedly, there were both impoverished people and people who jumped at an opportunity involved.

          • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Making people respond like you just did is the only reason they included the BMW part. I’m in California and there are pages and pages of early to mid 2000s BMWs available near me for less than $5k, which is significantly less than I paid for my car that no one would ever look at and think I’m rich.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          If poverty was driving crime rates, then most of the world (as most countries are much much poorer than the US) would be a crime infested shit hole. Somehow that’s not true at all. US crime is not related to poverty in any way.

          • dangblingus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            All you have to do is look at the crime statistics and income statistics for cities across North America. Cities that have lower GDPs (less money, less opportunity) generally have higher crime rates. If despair is high, people will act out of desperation. What you are wilfully ignoring is the fact that “countries that are poorer than the US” also are drastically different culturally than the US. Almost nowhere else on Earth has the same kind of income disparity that the US has. You can’t take a developing nation where 50% of people live in poverty, and compare it to a developed nation where no one needs to live in poverty but are forced to do so by manipulated housing and job markets.

      • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course poor people aren’t “basically just animals”, the OP didn’t imply that. What the OP is saying is that when genuine opportunity doesn’t exist, some people will find their own opportunity and/or weigh the consequences of their actions differently.

        Wealth and income disparity have consequences and this is one of them. Public unrest is another eventual outcome. Something needs to be done about it or something will be done about it.

  • MrMamiya@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Coming soon in America: Mall cops with guns!

    Sign up now for our 1 week certification program to be ready for your exciting career!

    Do you:

    Believe property has intrinsic value beyond the arbitrary price placed on it by the producer?

    Believe that value is higher than that of a human life?

    Really want to shoot someone to prove your devotion to property?

    Believe harsh punishment up to and including death is a deterrent to crime?

    Head over to your local mall’s security office and sign up today!

    • Rashnet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your comment is on the nose.

      I have had many arguments with people over the fact you shouldn’t want to shoot someone over property. I’m a gun owner but I don’t carry a gun and I don’t believe a life is worth less than property. The amount of people I know who carry a gun and have said they would shot someone for stealing is incredibly high and troubling.

      I don’t know if it is a direct result of the daily dehumanization of ethnic groups and criminals we are bombarded with all day long everyday or if it is much more complex but there is a real problem in the US when large groups of people don’t value other people’s lives.

      • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Once you use threats and violence to steal other’s property, you open yourself to bodily harm. Simple as.

      • JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t believe a life is worth less than property.

        I don’t understand the disconnect some people have when it comes to property. Property (and money) is a store of my time. My literal life. I worked for a year to be able to afford my car. You think someone else is entitled to steal an entire year of my life? That’s as close to endorsement of slavery as it gets. Do I think another should be permitted to steal my life? Absolutely not, under any circumstances. I don’t want to kill anyone, and I’ll give them a warning, but I would absolutely defend my life.

      • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        When you value someone else’s stuff more than your own life then that’s all that needs to be said. Condoning criminality breeds criminals.

        • Rashnet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          I never said anything about condoning criminality. I said valuing property higher than life isn’t right. I said this in another post a few days ago but I’ll say it again. I live in a high crime area and I am sick and tired of people stealing from not only me but my neighbors and from businesses that support the community’s needs. That doesn’t change the fact I think it’s morally repugnant to want to kill someone for property theft.

          If we invested more in community building and opportunities along with courts and police departments upholding the law we would have less of these types of crimes. Where I live the police stopped policing because they got mad after several officers were charged with the murder of a kid they arrested. In my eyes that makes them the same as the people stealing from the community. The courts here rarely convict juveniles so the kids know they can get away with just about anything.

          While I say I live in a high crime area I also know that overall in the US crime rates have been declining over the years especially violent crime rates.

          Wikipedia Crime stats

          • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s morally repugnant to threaten someone’s well-being over property. One begats the other. Cause and affect.

  • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Imagine being an oblivious shopper trying out clothes in the change room, eventually coming out with your selections, only emerging to a store that looks like a hurricane went through it.

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, I don’t agree. Cops regularly act on shoplifting and commercial damages. It’s only when burglars attack regular people that cops don’t care. eg, try complaining to a cop if someone breaks into your car or steals a package off your porch or steals your bike. They don’t give a shit about any of those things. But you can regularly see cops detaining shoplifters at any Walmart or the likes. There’s regularly cases of cops being shamed because they bragged about arresting someone stealing food (heck, I saw such a post literally minutes ago on this site).

  • TimeNaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    The mace part isn’t great but otherwise I say go get it.

    This is nothing compared to what these corpos stole from us.

  • JTode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    When they steal food, I cheer. When they steal jewelry and snearks and whatnot I lol

  • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The kids grew up learning heists on gta online, I for one approve of this well coordinated maneuvering against the establishment that steals from its people every day.