• bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, we know. We’re very well aware.

    Honestly this is the first article I’ve seen from a major outlet actually saying it outright instead of pretending the people and workers are the problem. Now what the fuck are we going to do about it?

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Stock buybacks should have stayed illegal. It’s naked market manipulation done as a flex with whatever fresh layoffs cash you have on-hand.

    The stock market is literally gambling, and these behemoth corporations are allowed to affect the outcome. It’s blatantly cheating, but TPTB made it not just legal, but commonplace.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Stock buybacks should have stayed illegal. It’s naked market manipulation done as a flex with whatever fresh layoffs cash you have on-hand.

      Oh come on. Sometimes its bailout cash.

    • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’m okay with buybacks because it’s the only way for a corporation to go private if they want to, and honestly I think the stock market would probably be a lot healthier if the idea was for corporations to eventually buy back stocks after going public instead of them getting traded like commodities. I mean, my understanding is that’s kinda how private investing works. You give someone money in exchange for ownership of a percentage of the company, a share of the profits, or whatever, and eventually the company will pay you back.

      However, stocks that are bought back should be frozen for a certain period of or something; to keep corporations from using them to game the system.

      Edit: I also think things like CEO bonuses and stocks should be capped to a percentage of their workers’ bonuses. If workers receive a $1,000 bonus, the CEO shouldn’t be getting $10 million. If the CEO wants to give themselves a $10m bonus, then that’s fine, they should just be prepared to shell out 6~7 figure bonuses to their workers.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is why, they keep saying trickle down is a myth because when it finally happens it’s gonna be way more than a trickle… Right?

      Like… Right?

  • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    In the UK they’ve tried to label this as the cost of living crisis, as if the change in value due to inflation it put to some kind of inflation control account in the sky.

    Its always been the corporate greed crisis. You’ll even get corporate bootlickers trying some kind of “its not like they just became greedy.” Which is true. However, they’ve never had such a good excuse to whack up their prices, to see what sticks, and have the very same people they’re ripping off stick up for them rather than use their brains before.

    Stock bros with just enough knowledge to be dangerous types.