• DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well I guess it is if you count meth / crack as pharma.

        In terms of researching new therapeutic drugs I don’t think most people would be able to be contributors if they don’t have multi million dollar labs on hand.

        • putridfairytale [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I don’t, lol

          maybe not drug discovery but my fever dream showed me a world where there are thousands of comrade chemists and pharmacists making and freely distributing already-known pharmaceuticals to people who need them, free of charge

          drug discovery can and should continue to be done via public funding after the pharmaceutical companies are nationalized. this was also a scene from my dream.

    • Magician [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The US government has emergency powers to limit patents. I can’t recall a time it’s been yet in recent memory (but they could pull out the parliamentarian bullshit).

      But you’d think a drug that reduces the transmission of HIV down to under a percent would be freely available. I mean just make it freely available, have doctors recommend it when applicable, and we could reduce HIV to a more manageable condition.

      I think about gay men I’ve talked to who couldn’t afford PrEP or didn’t even know it existed. Sex education is a nightmare in the US and we’re sending lgbt kids in blind when there are so many resources stuck behind paywalls.