testeronious@lemmy.world to

Climate@slrpnk.net · 2 年前

Taking CO2 out of the air would be an absurdly expensive way to fight climate change

www.theverge.com

298

Taking CO2 out of the air would be an absurdly expensive way to fight climate change

www.theverge.com

testeronious@lemmy.world to

Climate@slrpnk.net · 2 年前

Taking CO2 out of the air would be an absurdly expensive way to fight climate change

www.theverge.com

It could cost the US $100 billion a year.

Chat

ThunderclapSasquatch
link
fedilink
arrow-up
3·
2 年前
We could grow more hemp too, more efficient at carbon removal than trees

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

232 users / day
1.13K users / week
2.65K users / month
6.67K users / 6 months
35 local subscribers
8.38K subscribers
11.7K Posts
42.1K Comments
Modlog

mods:
silence7@slrpnk.net