vividspecter@lemm.ee to Melbourne@aussie.zone · 3 months agoNimbys v Yimbys: the affluent inner Melbourne suburbs that aren’t pulling their weight on housingwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down14
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkNimbys v Yimbys: the affluent inner Melbourne suburbs that aren’t pulling their weight on housingwww.theguardian.comvividspecter@lemm.ee to Melbourne@aussie.zone · 3 months agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareDolphinLundgrin@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·3 months agoAnyone with a tennis court should be forced to subdivide, and get no compensation.
minus-squareNath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoThat’s a bit rough isn’t it? Why tennis courts specifically and not people with gardens? or Pools? Is it just that anyone who has a tennis court is therefore rich and won’t notice the financial loss?
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-23 months agoI’ve seen a pool fit in a subdivided lot. Gardens have use. A tennis court is a bullshit vanity.
Anyone with a tennis court should be forced to subdivide, and get no compensation.
That’s a bit rough isn’t it? Why tennis courts specifically and not people with gardens? or Pools? Is it just that anyone who has a tennis court is therefore rich and won’t notice the financial loss?
I’ve seen a pool fit in a subdivided lot. Gardens have use. A tennis court is a bullshit vanity.
Yes.