• 11 Posts
  • 689 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle




  • It’s worse than that - he wasn’t being lazy, he was convinced that if he came out of the tunnel, the rain would ruin his paint. Even after it stopped raining, he still wouldn’t come out just in case it started raining again.

    Basically he had a mental illness, and his punishment was to be bricked up and forced to watch the other trains going past. One is friendly, one says it serves him right. Because he has no steam, he’s unable to communicate. And all the time his paint is slowly getting ruined anyway because he’s stuck in the tunnel.

    As someone who’s had a breakdown, it really resonates in a different way than it did when I was a kid.







  • So, there’s some truth to this, but not in the way that you’ve summed it up.

    Crucially, you need to understand that there isn’t a “the English accent”. It’s also important to remember that as wildly different as accents in England are now, they were even more different from each other several hundred years ago.

    So which accents are we talking about for this story? Well, the early American colonies had settlers mostly from London and Southern England.

    This is the accent that then diverged.

    At the time, and in the South of England particularly, speech was becoming less rhotic. In the American colonies, however, it retained its rhoticity, as it still does in many parts of Britain even today.

    This is further complicated by the fact that later massive influxes of people came from parts of Britain that did retain rhoticity in their accents, in particular the West Country, Scotland and Ireland (incidentally, all which still have it today).

    So, like I said, there’s some truth to it, but it’s not quite as you’ve phrased it. Elizabethan Brits didn’t sound like modern-day Boston folk. Americans very much have accents all of their own, influenced by not just by native English, but speakers of other languages too.

    So, it’s definitely a neat little tidbit, but it’s usually wildly mistated!





  • I’m not sure I agree… Even before the 2e version there was still some basic cohesion with the six limbs. The only real exceptions to this were the squigs.

    By the time 2e came along, squigs were gone (along with zoats 😢) but the cohesion was increased even further - everything now had the Tyranid Warrior style exoskeletons, six limbs, teeth and shells. They looked like they shared a fundamental biology

    I realise that the Armorcast models are based off the simplified cartoonier epic versions. I think the main issue is I didn’t like them to start with either 😑