Shorts dont have the inserted scripted ads peppered through the video. Perfect for when I just want a short concise explanation for how to do some task, like change a faucet aerator or swap the air filter in my car. So I disagree, shorts have a place in search results at the moment.
Once those get ads, yeah, they should be separate.
I’m shocked that any physical products ever got into the hands of the people who wanted then, I thought for sure it was a total scam. Apparently I was right, just not in the way I had thought.
Self hosting some file servers. Maybe Jellyfin if it’s mostly for Audio and books rather then videos.
Executive disfunction spaghetti
Pretty sure ChatGPT was used to write the TOS as well, it doesn’t read like something to be expected from a capable lawyer.
Well as a gentleman that is when one must arrive. 🧐
Also lets build solar farms over more pavement rather then more grass and farmland.
Elephants and submarines. Can’t wait for next update to drop, the devs are getting more creative with this!
Didn’t one of these trip and shake itself to bits?
I co-chaired the committee that reviewed the recommendation to revise the color of the book that regulation’s in… We kept it grey!"
Bureaucratic babbel at it’s finest.
Let’s look at this from the other perspective too.
“Rich boss can’t stand human contact, trains a computer to think and talk like him to interact with underlings in his place.”
That’s why. Because Zucker can’t be bothered to speak with the rest of us any more then he must.
Let’s look at this from the other perspective too.
“Rich boss can’t stand human contact, trains a computer to think and talk like him to interact with underlings in his place.”
This is great!
The incorrect assumption here is that disbelief is an active state. Denouncment and denial may be active states of thought, but disbelief is a passive state. Like the way that on and off are an active and passive state, respectively. The argument that disbelief implies the denial of something that therefore must exist to be denied at all is inherently flawed by this assumption. If I, being in a state of ignorance of subject “x”, would have neither belief nor disbelief in “x”, but total unawareness of "x"s potential existence as a subject. To then be told by an outside perspective that “x” exists and I must believe in that existence without any proof of the claimed state of “x”, I could choose to continue without further consideration of “x” and my existence would continue without belief or disbelief in “x”, only knowledge of that concept existing for outside perspectives. However, I could more easily explain this reasoning to others with the simple statement “I do not believe in “x”.” My statement would be reductive and simplistic, yes, but would do nothing to prove that “x” must exist and hold my belief because I have any knowledge of its concept.
The claim must be proven by the one making it, not the one being told of it.
Beard oil. It exists, it is amazing, and it stopped my itching. I comb a little into my beard every one or two days, takes like 5 minutes if I go slow.
The third boob didn’t give it away?
Change the flat tire on my bike and go for a ride with my son.
I understand. I’m ND so it’s hard for me to pickup social cues as it is, text makes it especially hard to figure out emotion or intention at times.
Thank you again for helping me understand a little better. 😁
This raises a question. If Sung gave Data all the same functions as a living human, besides DNA, does that mean the Doctor designed, built, and installed a way for Data to frost Tasha with a glaze? 🤔