I see what you did there

I think the whole stove’s on fire tbh

Both can be true. Grindr’s statement doesn’t disprove this claim and is in fact compatible.

Risking “a” proposed park is a drop in the bucket in the face of how easily this system can be abused. There are no provisions from making logging claims without any intention of actually logging and thereby claiming “fake” carbon credits.

The damage this does, including severe risks of potential wildfires destroying said park, dramatically outweighs the benefit of one singular park.

Half-blind 80 year olds on e-bikes scare me much more than some youth doing wheelies

Ultimately yes. People easily get confused between power density (power per volume), energy density(energy per volume), specific energy(energy per mass unit) and specific power(power per mass unit)

Didn’t we literally just establish that the power density is higher than Li-Ion?

How is “Don’t be lazy and procrastinate” a cheat code…?

About as dumb as “just buy a house” if you’re homeless.

Fr people posting shit like “I’m nice and think positively” don’t understand the term “cheat code”.

Drugs are a cheat code, “thinking positively” is work

Some things are just human experiences, touch grass y’all

…You should make sure you know the actual technical definition of an algorithm if you’re gonna be semantically pedantic.

Speaking in actual technical terms; an algorithm is by definition a finite set of instructions, so technically any endless feed is no longer “an algorithm”, it is the result of looping an algorithm.

When drafting legislation you’re right, but she is not actively drafting legislation, she is proposing an idea to the public.

Good communication means tailoring your language to your audience.

deleted by creator

Listen man, if you want to deny her aggression that preceded all this that’s fine, but don’t act like you’re standing up for women while doing so.

You’re denying basic agency to women, you misogynist.

Never developed past the first-wave of feminism?

Now screenshot her invading his space literally 1 second before this.

Throwing a drink in someones face is harmless, threatening someone with a bottle is not.

Are you blind or just a misogynist who cant accept that women are human beings capable of aggression?

Sigh… k

That’s a blog, not a news outlet

Women are human beings and therefore capable of aggression. I see a man defending her invasions of his space in close to the most non-violent way possible.

I fail to see how he supposedly attacked her first…

This blog is not a news source.