• 0 Posts
  • 1.14K Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 16th, 2025

help-circle








  • You’re just repeating your assertion that the time taken for Ofcom to act against X is due to improper influence but haven’t given any evidence. What examples are you thinking of where Ofcom has acted quickly? This controversy has, I believe, been going on for three weeks, prominently only for one.

    The Online Safety Act specifies time limits for responses from services, and those time limits themselves vary from a week to several months. Ofcom also publishes updates on its investigations and the one I’m familiar with - Imgur - took months to do anything.

    You’re making excuses for CSAM distributed by the richest man in the world, why?

    Take me through your line of reasoning here: I don’t think Ofcom is giving Twitter special treatment; ???; therefore I’m making excuses for CSAM? Please do fill in the missing steps.











  • FishFace@piefed.socialtomemes@lemmy.worldSafety
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Having sold a few things online, it’s fairly common for one person to chat online and another to have over/receive the money. The person chatting is the person who is most interested in the item; the person handing over is the person who has the time on the day.