• 0 Posts
  • 76 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle




  • Settler colonialism is a form of colonialism where the empire displaces or eradicates the natives in order to offer the natives’ land to settlers. This gives settlers a strong material incentive to migrate there (free land), as well as a common enemy to rally against (the natives).

    Classic examples of settler colonies are the British American colonies (later the U.S.) and Israel. Contrast with a colonial project like British India. Nazi Germany undertook a settler colonial project in Eastern Europe (that was directly inspired by the U.S. treatment of natives) that was stopped before it could be completed.











  • Where these wars happened anyway, they either weren’t between states (but civil wars or insurgencies instead), they were so lopsided in numerical or technological terms that they were over before they really began (e.g. Desert Storm) or they happened in Africa where it’s easy not to notice them for the rest of the world. There were a few exceptions, e.g. Iran-Iraq, but they don’t really change the general picture.

    Some terrible history right here. Writes off a ton of “total war”-style conflicts (presumably the post-WWII phase of the Chinese Civil War, plus the entire Korean War, plus the independence struggle of Vietnam from 1945-1975) because… if they’re civil wars or insurgencies (extremely fuzzy categories to begin with) they don’t count? Doesn’t address a few peer conflicts between India and Pakistan that thankfully stopped soon after they began. Doesn’t address the wars Vietnam fought against China and Cambodia in the late 70s/early 80s. Writes off another whole category of lopsided wars that are still incredibly destructive, especially when you look at the effects of long-term destabilization (Yugoslavia and Libya come to mind). Handwaves Africa for no good reason, and recognizes a glaring example of exactly what they’re talking about (Iran-Iraq) but ignores it as an exception (it’s really not!). Doesn’t even think of comparing the damage done by industrialized warfare to mass killings in Indonesia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, and Latin America.

    Blaming Kiev for breaking some non-existent taboo against total war is a stretch, too. There are many times Kiev could have defused the situation (from 2014 all the way to the aborted ceasefire agreement soon after the war began), but fighting a whole-ass army the only way one can fight a whole-ass army is a response you’d expect from basically any country in Ukraine’s situation (it was a prerequisite to getting a deal as good as they had right after the start of the war, too).



  • they have violence fantasies and being communists allows them to live these out

    A huge problem to guard against. Frothing at the mouth about revenge fantasies is purely an aesthetic choice, and not a good one. Righteous anger is understandable, as are occasional jokes, but too many people go well beyond that. And they’ll double and triple down when you try to have a more sober discussion about the role of violence in society.


  • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.mltoGenZedong@lemmygrad.mlMeta meme
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You compare a country to what it came from, with all it’s imperfections. And those who demand instant perfection the day after the revolution, they go up and say “Are there civil liberties for the fascists? Are they gonna be allowed their newspapers and their radio programs, are they gonna be able to keep all their farms? The passion that some of our liberals feel, the day after the revolution, the passion and concern they feel for the fascists, the civil rights and civil liberties of those fascists who are dumping and destroying and murdering people before. Now the revolution has gotta be perfect, it’s gotta be flawless. Well that isn’t my criteria, my criteria is what happens to those people who couldn’t read? What happens to those babies that couldn’t eat, that died of hunger? And that’s why I support revolution. The revolution that feeds the children gets my support.

    Michael Parenti, On the Cuban Revolution

    During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative… What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

    Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds


  • There is a much broader mass of people out there who are not liberal, most of them are just apolitical or only very superficially political in one direction or the other

    Reaching out to these people is good, too, but I’m not sold that they’re easier/more worthwhile to bring around than more committed libs (let’s define that as regular Democratic Party voters):

    1. As @GarbageShoot@hexbear.net pointed out, a lot of “apolitical” people are still pretty dug in on their priors, they just… aren’t that interested in politics. Maybe that changes with exposure to leftist politics, but maybe the effort we put in just gets us (more) armchair revolutionaries. A lot of more committed libs have done real-world stuff like phonebanking, canvassing, staffing events, maybe even some protesting.
    2. A lasting change to your worldview usually requires significant learning, which takes time and attention. Committed libs already set aside time and attention for politics; it’s a matter of getting them to read/watch something different in the time they already spend on politics, not carve out new time to read/watch something they might not be interested in at all.
    3. As long as you’re somewhat honest with yourself – which is a prerequisite for being persuadable – being dug in on a position can backfire if it’s a bad one. If I’m a lib who’s genuinely horrified at how the U.S. handles its southern border, leftists pointing out how Obama and Biden have worsened the situation is not something I’ll dismiss out of hand. It’ll stick with me. If I’m used to occasionally hearing about bad stuff but resigned to being apolitical, how is hearing about one more bad thing going to change that?
    4. Bernie based his campaigns around turning out apolitical people and the left wing of committed Dems; there was some success there, but not enough. And the task there was only getting apolitical folks to do the easiest form of political participation: voting for a popular candidate.