Forks do not exist in git. It’s a GitHub feature, and a massive blunder at the same time.
Forks do not exist in git. It’s a GitHub feature, and a massive blunder at the same time.
200 MB modern application built on top of Chrome can’t handle a few files.
Emacs from the 70/80s can handle a thousand files. Something is wrong with computers.
Actually it’s
$60,000 in cloud credits
So 0%.
deleted by creator
Is there a downside? I’m confused.
I don’t understand the downvotes. You’re right on all points. If the task is too big, it can take years from testing another solution to using it for real.
I’m bored too, but not bored enough to post shitty shit like this.
On veut des photos avant et après, même floutées.
Do you do it yourself with a European recipe? You would get the same result I guess.
Back when Nginx started, Apache was the only alternative and a big pain in the ass. That’s how it became popular.
That’s boring. Altman wants to save the world whatever that means, not solve the shitty problems that poor people have.
Then don’t avoid him and be natural. That’s all.
Is it popular? Never heard of that in France.
This game was released 10 years after git, and we already had backups since the 80s. Why are they lying?
Cheap and expensive at the same time. I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a product.
No, he means Hungary the country who has the presidency of EU is begging the same EU to obey Putin.
I would be confused too if I were you.
Only Americans seem to say this. Why? I’ve seen a lot of couples at work and no one minds.
How can such a wrong answer get so many points? Clones and forge forks are unrelated. First, GitHub or GitLab cannot and could not link clones together without analyzing the remotes of each clone.
FFS it’s a tech community…